Bureaucrats, cc_docs_admin, cc_staff
2,879
edits
BLAS and LAPACK: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
= Which implementation should I use ? = <!--T:4--> | = Which implementation should I use ? = <!--T:4--> | ||
For the past few years, we have been recommending to use Intel MKL as a reference implementation. This recommendation was driven by the fact that we only had Intel processors in our clusters. This changed with the arrival of Narval, which is built with AMD processors. We now recommend using FlexiBLAS when compiling code. Our FlexiBLAS module is configured such that Intel MKL will be used except when using AMD processors, in which case BLIS will be used. This | For the past few years, we have been recommending to use Intel MKL as a reference implementation. This recommendation was driven by the fact that we only had Intel processors in our clusters. This changed with the arrival of Narval, which is built with AMD processors. We now recommend using FlexiBLAS when compiling code. Our FlexiBLAS module is configured such that Intel MKL will be used except when using AMD processors, in which case BLIS will be used. This arrangement will usually offer optimal performance. | ||
= How do I compile against FlexiBLAS ? = <!--T:5--> | = How do I compile against FlexiBLAS ? = <!--T:5--> | ||