Points de contrôle/en: Difference between revisions

From Alliance Doc
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with ".")
(Updating to match new version of source page)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Draft}}
<languages />
<languages />
The execution time for a program is sometimes too long for the maximum duration of a job permitted by the job schedulers used on Compute Canada clusters. Long-running jobs are also subject to all of the risks of system instability due to power outages, hardware defects and so forth. A program with a short execution time can easily be restarted with little concern but for long-running software it is preferable to use checkpoints to minimize the risk of losing several days' worth of computation. These checkpoints take the form of binary disk files from which the program can be restarted at the point in the computation where the checkpoint file was initially created.
The execution time for a program is sometimes too long for the maximum duration of a job permitted by the job schedulers used on Compute Canada clusters. Long-running jobs are also subject to all of the risks of system instability due to power outages, hardware defects and so forth. A program with a short execution time can easily be restarted with little concern but for long-running software it is preferable to use checkpoints to minimize the risk of losing several days' worth of computation. These checkpoints take the form of binary disk files from which the program can be restarted at the point in the computation where the checkpoint file was initially created.
Line 12: Line 14:
** The creation of the checkpoint file can be made ''atomic'' by performing an operation which confirms the end of the checkpoint process. For example, the checkpoint file can be initially named based on the date and time and, as the final step, a symbolic link ''latest-version'' is pointed at this new checkpoint file. Another more advanced method would be to create a second file which contains a hash of the checkpoint file's content by means of which the restart function can verify the integrity of the checkpoint when it is loaded.  
** The creation of the checkpoint file can be made ''atomic'' by performing an operation which confirms the end of the checkpoint process. For example, the checkpoint file can be initially named based on the date and time and, as the final step, a symbolic link ''latest-version'' is pointed at this new checkpoint file. Another more advanced method would be to create a second file which contains a hash of the checkpoint file's content by means of which the restart function can verify the integrity of the checkpoint when it is loaded.  
** Once the atomic write has been completed, one can choose whether or not to delete any older checkpoints.
** Once the atomic write has been completed, one can choose whether or not to delete any older checkpoints.
Afin de ne pas réinventer la roue, surtout si la modification du code source n'est pas une option, nous suggérons l'utilisation de [http://dmtcp.sourceforge.net/ DMTCP].


<div class="mw-translate-fuzzy">
<div class="mw-translate-fuzzy">
Line 18: Line 22:
</div>  
</div>  


<div class="mw-translate-fuzzy">


.  
.
</div>




Line 37: Line 43:
#SBATCH --mem=100M
#SBATCH --mem=100M
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------
echo "Current working directory: `pwd`"
echo "Current working directory: $(pwd)"
echo "Starting run at: `date`"
echo "Starting run at: $(date)"
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------
# Run your simulation step here...
# Run your simulation step here...
Line 44: Line 50:
if test -e "dmtcp_restart_script.sh"; then  
if test -e "dmtcp_restart_script.sh"; then  
     # There is a checkpoint file, restart;
     # There is a checkpoint file, restart;
     ./dmtcp_restart_script.sh -h `hostname`
     ./dmtcp_restart_script.sh -h $(hostname)
else
else
     # There is no checkpoint file, start a new simulation.
     # There is no checkpoint file, start a new simulation.
Line 51: Line 57:


# ---------------------------------------------------------------------
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------
echo "Job finished with exit code $? at: `date`"
echo "Job finished with exit code $? at: $(date)"
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------
}}
}}
-->
== Resubmitting a Job for Long-Running Computations ==
== Resubmitting a Job for Long-Running Computations ==
If you plan on breaking up a lengthy computation into several Slurm jobs, there are [[Running_jobs#Resubmitting_jobs_for_long_running_computations|two recommended methods]]:  
If you plan on breaking up a lengthy computation into several Slurm jobs, there are [[Running_jobs#Resubmitting_jobs_for_long_running_computations|two recommended methods]]:  
* [[Running_jobs#Restarting_using_job_arrays|using Slurm job arrays]];
* [[Running_jobs#Restarting_using_job_arrays|using Slurm job arrays]];
* [[Running_jobs#Resubmission_from_the_job_script|resubmission from the end of the job script]].
* [[Running_jobs#Resubmission_from_the_job_script|resubmission from the end of the job script]].

Revision as of 12:46, 19 October 2017


This article is a draft

This is not a complete article: This is a draft, a work in progress that is intended to be published into an article, which may or may not be ready for inclusion in the main wiki. It should not necessarily be considered factual or authoritative.




Other languages:

The execution time for a program is sometimes too long for the maximum duration of a job permitted by the job schedulers used on Compute Canada clusters. Long-running jobs are also subject to all of the risks of system instability due to power outages, hardware defects and so forth. A program with a short execution time can easily be restarted with little concern but for long-running software it is preferable to use checkpoints to minimize the risk of losing several days' worth of computation. These checkpoints take the form of binary disk files from which the program can be restarted at the point in the computation where the checkpoint file was initially created.

Creating and Loading a Checkpoint

The creation and loading of a checkpoint may already be taken care of by the application you're using. In this case you simply need to read the relevant documentation about how to use this functionality.

However, if you have access to the source code of the software and/or if you are the author, you can implement a checkpoint/restart functionality in the program yourself. The essential steps are:

  • The creation of a checkpoint file is done periodically, with a suggested frequency of every 2 to 24 hours
  • While writing the checkpoint file, it's important to remember that the program could be interrupted at any moment and this for a variety of reasons. As a consequence,
    • It is preferable to not delete the preceding checkpoint when creating the new one.
    • The creation of the checkpoint file can be made atomic by performing an operation which confirms the end of the checkpoint process. For example, the checkpoint file can be initially named based on the date and time and, as the final step, a symbolic link latest-version is pointed at this new checkpoint file. Another more advanced method would be to create a second file which contains a hash of the checkpoint file's content by means of which the restart function can verify the integrity of the checkpoint when it is loaded.
    • Once the atomic write has been completed, one can choose whether or not to delete any older checkpoints.

Afin de ne pas réinventer la roue, surtout si la modification du code source n'est pas une option, nous suggérons l'utilisation de DMTCP.

So as not to re-invent the wheel, particularly in situations where modifying the source code isn't an option, an alternative solution is the use of the software DMTCP.

.


.

Fichier : job_with_dmtcp.sh

#!/bin/bash
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------
# SLURM script for job resubmission on a Compute Canada cluster. 
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------
#SBATCH --job-name=job_chain
#SBATCH --account=def-someuser
#SBATCH --cpus-per-task=1
#SBATCH --time=0-10:00
#SBATCH --mem=100M
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------
echo "Current working directory: $(pwd)"
echo "Starting run at: $(date)"
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------
# Run your simulation step here...

if test -e "dmtcp_restart_script.sh"; then 
     # There is a checkpoint file, restart;
     ./dmtcp_restart_script.sh -h $(hostname)
else
     # There is no checkpoint file, start a new simulation.
     dmtcp_launch --rm  -i 3600 -q <programme> <arg1> ... <argn>
fi

# ---------------------------------------------------------------------
echo "Job finished with exit code $? at: $(date)"
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------


Resubmitting a Job for Long-Running Computations

If you plan on breaking up a lengthy computation into several Slurm jobs, there are two recommended methods: