OpenACC Tutorial - Adding directives: Difference between revisions

From Alliance Doc
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "<languages /> {{Objectives |title=<translate>Learning objectives</translate> |content= <translate> * Understand the process of ''offloading'' * Understand what is an OpenACC...")
 
No edit summary
Line 21: Line 21:
OpenACC directives are much like OpenMP directives. They take the form of <tt>pragma</tt> in C/C++, and comments in Fortran. The advantages of this method are numerous. First, since it involves very minor modifications to the code, changes can be done ''incrementally'', one <tt>pragma</tt> at a time. This is especially useful for debugging purpose, since making a single change at a time allows one to quickly identify which change created a bug. Second, OpenACC support can be disabled at compile time. When OpenACC support is disabled, the <tt>pragma</tt> are considered comments, and ignored by the compiler. This means that a single source code can be used to compile both an accelerated version and a normal version. Third, since all of the offloading work is done by the compiler, the same code can be compiled for various accelerator types: GPUs, MIC (Xeon Phi) or CPUs. It also means that a new generation of devices only requires one to update the compiler, not to change the code.  
OpenACC directives are much like OpenMP directives. They take the form of <tt>pragma</tt> in C/C++, and comments in Fortran. The advantages of this method are numerous. First, since it involves very minor modifications to the code, changes can be done ''incrementally'', one <tt>pragma</tt> at a time. This is especially useful for debugging purpose, since making a single change at a time allows one to quickly identify which change created a bug. Second, OpenACC support can be disabled at compile time. When OpenACC support is disabled, the <tt>pragma</tt> are considered comments, and ignored by the compiler. This means that a single source code can be used to compile both an accelerated version and a normal version. Third, since all of the offloading work is done by the compiler, the same code can be compiled for various accelerator types: GPUs, MIC (Xeon Phi) or CPUs. It also means that a new generation of devices only requires one to update the compiler, not to change the code.  


In the following example, we take a code composed of two loops. The first one initializes two vectors, and the second performs a <tt>[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Basic_Linear_Algebra_Subprograms#Level_1 SAXPY]</tt>, a basic vector addition operation.  
In the following example, we take a code comprised of two loops. The first one initializes two vectors, and the second performs a <tt>[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Basic_Linear_Algebra_Subprograms#Level_1 SAXPY]</tt>, a basic vector addition operation.  
</translate>
</translate>


Line 52: Line 52:
!$acc end kernels
!$acc end kernels
</syntaxhighlight>
</syntaxhighlight>
|}


|}
Both in the C/C++ and the Fortran cases, the compiler will identify '''two''' kernels. In C/C++, the two kernels will correspond to the inside of each loops. In Fortran, the kernels will be the inside of the first loop, as well as the inside of the implicit loop that Fortran performs when it does an array operation.
 
Note that in C/C++, the OpenACC block is delimited using curly brackets, while in Fortran, the same comment needs to be repeated, with the <tt>end</tt>  keyword added.


{{Callout
|title=Loops vs Kernels
|content=
}}




<translate>
<translate>
</translate>
</translate>

Revision as of 14:55, 9 May 2016

Other languages:


Learning objectives
  • Understand the process of offloading
  • Understand what is an OpenACC directive.
  • Understand what is the difference between the loop and kernels directive.
  • Understand how to build a program with OpenACC
  • Understand what aliasing is in C/C++
  • Learn how to use compiler feedback and how fix false aliasing.


Offloading to a GPU

The first thing to realize when trying to port a code to a GPU is that they do not share the same memory as the CPU. In other words, a GPU does not have direct access to the host memory. The host memory is generally larger, but slower than the GPU memory. To use a GPU, data must therefore be transferred from the main program to the GPU through the PCI bus, which has a much lower bandwidth than either memories. This means that managing data transfer between the host and the GPU will be of paramount importance. Transferring the data and the code onto the device is called offloading.

OpenACC directives

OpenACC directives are much like OpenMP directives. They take the form of pragma in C/C++, and comments in Fortran. The advantages of this method are numerous. First, since it involves very minor modifications to the code, changes can be done incrementally, one pragma at a time. This is especially useful for debugging purpose, since making a single change at a time allows one to quickly identify which change created a bug. Second, OpenACC support can be disabled at compile time. When OpenACC support is disabled, the pragma are considered comments, and ignored by the compiler. This means that a single source code can be used to compile both an accelerated version and a normal version. Third, since all of the offloading work is done by the compiler, the same code can be compiled for various accelerator types: GPUs, MIC (Xeon Phi) or CPUs. It also means that a new generation of devices only requires one to update the compiler, not to change the code.

In the following example, we take a code comprised of two loops. The first one initializes two vectors, and the second performs a SAXPY, a basic vector addition operation.

C/C++ Fortran
#pragma acc kernels
{
  for (int i=0; i<N; i++)
  {
    x[i] = 1.0;
    y[i] = 2.0;
  }

  for (int i=0; i<N; i++)
  {
    y[i] = a * x[i] + y[i];
  }
}
!$acc kernels
  do i=1,N
    x(i) = 1.0
    y(i) = 2.0
  end do
  
  y(:) = a*x(:) + y(:)
!$acc end kernels

Both in the C/C++ and the Fortran cases, the compiler will identify two kernels. In C/C++, the two kernels will correspond to the inside of each loops. In Fortran, the kernels will be the inside of the first loop, as well as the inside of the implicit loop that Fortran performs when it does an array operation.

Note that in C/C++, the OpenACC block is delimited using curly brackets, while in Fortran, the same comment needs to be repeated, with the end keyword added.


Loops vs Kernels