cc_staff
176
edits
Known issues: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
== Scheduler errors == <!--T:6--> | == Scheduler errors == <!--T:6--> | ||
* The CC slurm configuration preferentially encourages whole-node jobs. Users should, if appropriate, request whole-node rather than per-core resources. See [[Job_scheduling_policies#Whole_nodes_versus_cores;|Job Scheduling - Whole Node Scheduling]] ([[User:Pjmann|Patrick Mann]] 20:15, 17 July 2017 (UTC)) | * The CC slurm configuration preferentially encourages whole-node jobs. Users should, if appropriate, request whole-node rather than per-core resources. See [[Job_scheduling_policies#Whole_nodes_versus_cores;|Job Scheduling - Whole Node Scheduling]] ([[User:Pjmann|Patrick Mann]] 20:15, 17 July 2017 (UTC)) | ||
* Cpu and Gpu backfill partitions have been created on both clusters. If a job is submitted with <24hr runtime, it will be automatically entered into the cluster-wide backfill partition. This partition has a low priority, but will allow increased utilization of the cluster by serial jobs. ([[User:Nathanw|Nathan Wielenga]]) | |||
* SLURM epilog does not fully clean up processes from ended jobs, especially if the job did not exit normally. ([[User:Gbnewby|Greg Newby]]) Fri Jul 14 19:32:48 UTC 2017) | * SLURM epilog does not fully clean up processes from ended jobs, especially if the job did not exit normally. ([[User:Gbnewby|Greg Newby]]) Fri Jul 14 19:32:48 UTC 2017) | ||
** This has been greatly improved after the addition of the epilog.clean script, but there are still nodes occasionally marked down for epilog failure. (NW) | ** This has been greatly improved after the addition of the epilog.clean script, but there are still nodes occasionally marked down for epilog failure. (NW) | ||