Bureaucrats, cc_docs_admin, cc_staff
2,879
edits
Allocations and compute scheduling: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
remove mention of unannounced system
m (Rdickson moved page Scheduling resources and allocations to Allocations and resource scheduling without leaving a redirect: Part of translatable page "Scheduling resources and allocations") |
(remove mention of unannounced system) |
||
| Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
<!--T:17--> | <!--T:17--> | ||
[[File:Core_equivalent_diagram_GP.png|frame|Figure 1 - Core equivalent diagram for Cedar | [[File:Core_equivalent_diagram_GP.png|frame|Figure 1 - Core equivalent diagram for Cedar and Graham.]] | ||
<!--T:18--> | <!--T:18--> | ||
Cedar | Cedar and Graham are considered to provide 4GB per core, since this corresponds to the most common node type in those clusters, making a core equivalent on these systems a core-memory bundle of 4GB per core. Niagara is considered to provide 4.8GB of memory per core, make a core equivalent on it a core-memory bundle of 4.8GB per core. Jobs are charged in terms of core equivalent usage at the rate of 4 or 4.8 GB per core, as explained above. See Figure 1. | ||
<!--T:19--> | <!--T:19--> | ||